Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
Related issue
Flock surveillance cameras in city parks→At a glance
- Public comments
- 2
- Last 30 days
- 0
Discussed at 1 meeting in the last 60 days; most recently Sep 22, 2026.
Public comments (7)
Renewed his call for the city manager to cancel the Flock camera contract and install a closed-circuit TV alternative, citing documented abuses of Flock systems and criticizing the $800,000 park concession spending.
City Council - Sep 22, 2026 · 21:02 →Said the city lacks policies governing the cameras' use, questioned the $30,000 two-year contract, and urged removal or strict accountability measures.
City Council - Aug 25, 2026 · 20:30 →Cited officer misuse cases and abuse databases nationwide, questioned funding sources for contract renewal, criticized the city manager's unresponsiveness, and called out the Marion County sheriff's contract renewal.
City Council - Aug 25, 2026 · 25:19 →Urged removal of Flock Condor cameras from city parks, citing exposed unprotected livestreams of children and urging traditional CCTV or human-centered safety measures instead.
City Council - Aug 25, 2026 · 16:01 →Criticized lack of transparency and FOIA hurdles, said opposition unites people across the political spectrum, and noted six council seats are on the November ballot with Flock as a top issue.
City Council - Aug 25, 2026 · 32:17 →Worried about what happens to footage data on the network, prior breaches in California and Georgia, and how AI could manipulate collected footage.
City Council - Aug 25, 2026 · 30:02 →Grant Town resident opposed the Flock cameras, citing disputed crime-reduction data, security breaches, privacy risks, lack of community input, and the roughly $30,000 spent that he argued could fund proven crime-prevention programs.
City Council - Aug 11, 2026 · 23:36 →